Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46507 (MAD)

A.Munusamy v. The Labor Inspector

WP/24178/2015 · 2025-03-19

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.08.2015 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Writ Petition No.24178 of 2015 1. A.Munusamy 2. K.Arumugam 3. H.Venkgadesan 4. Y.Suresh 5. S.Kumaravel 6. R.Silambarasan 7. G.Jagadeesan 8. A.Karthik 9. P.Sampath Kumar 10. S.Thanigachalam 11. M.Rajan 12. B.Selvaraj 13. M.Esrale 14. E.Nagaraj 15. S.Gopal 16. M.Elumalai 17. E.Mogan 18. M.Nagarajan 19. M.Gnanasekar 20. Y.Pillaiyah 21. G.Vengatakrishnaiyah 22. G.Thiruppathiya 23. K.Samuvel 24. M.Rajan 25. G.Suresh 26. P.Deivasigamani 27. R.Ritheesh 28. M.Murugan 29. S.Vijayakumar 30. G.Sureshkumar 31. M.Vengat Rao 32. K.Arunagiri 33. S.Tamilvanan 34. R.Suresh 35. D.Anandharaj 36. M.Loganathan 37. D.Kannan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 38. K.Vengadesan 39. B.Shankar 40. S.Satheeshkumar 41. P.Prasanna 42. S.Linkeshwaran 43. P.Baburao 44. D.Vengat Rao 45. R.Ravichandiran 46. M.Vengatesh Varalu 47. Y.Ananthan 48. M.Raj 49. R.Arun 50. G.Ravi 51. R.Vengadesan 52. N.Kamaraj 53. G.Hariharan 54. P.Babu 55. A.Murali 56. S.Aputhakeer 57. A.Sureshpabu 58. M.Rupkrishnan 59. S.Madhan 60. K.Chandrasekar 61. M.Karunagaran 62. S.Purushothaman 63. C.Ravi 64. R.Kannan 65. K.Pazhani 66. K.Vijayakumar 67. S.T.Devasakayam 68. S.Mohammed Ali 69. Vasu 70. R.Babu 71. S.Prabu 72. G.N.Srinivasalu 73. R.Ravi 74. A.Mohan 75. A.Vadivelan 76. R.Ragavan 77. D.Selvamakesh 78. P.Ravikumar 79. P.Munusamy 80. R.Padmanapan 81. M.Paulraj 82. S.Santhiramurthi 83. M.Jeyaraman 84. T.Chinnamiraiyah ... Petitioners https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Vs. 1. The Labour Inspector, Under T.N.Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035 2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003 3. The Chief Engineer, Mechanical Department, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai – 600 003 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 2 and 3 to comply with the order passed by the first respondent in Case No.240/2013, dated 27.01.2015. For Petitioners : Mr. N.Valliamma For Respondents : Mr. S.Gunasekaran, Government Advocate, for R-1 Mr. P.V.Selvakumar, for R-2 & R-3 O R D E R Admit. Mr. S.Gunasekaran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the first respondent and Mr. P.V.Selvakumar, learned counsel, takes notice for respondents 2 and 3. By consent of the learned counsel for both sides, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. The petitioners would claim that they are working in the services of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation from the year 2008 onwards and inspite of the long service, they have not been regularized and hence, they moved the first respondent, under the provisions of The Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981, and they also got the orders on 27.07.2012 and 05.07.2013, respectively. Their plea was rejected and challenging the same, they filed W.P.No.19389 of 2013 and this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court, vide order, dated 18.07.2013, had set-aside the orders of the first respondent, dated 27.07.2012 and 05.07.2013 and remanded the matter back to the first respondent for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, within a stipulated time frame. Thereafter, the first respondent has considered the claim of the petitioners and 19 others and passed an order, dated 27.01.2015, ordering the conferment of the permanent status. 3. The petitioners, thereafter, submitted repeated representations to comply with the said order, for which the third respondent has sent a reply, dated 11.05.2015, stating that the third respondent is taking steps to challenge the order, dated 18.07.2013 made in W.P.No.19389 of 2013, and subject to the result of the appeal, the petitioners' claim will be considered. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the order in W.P.No.19389 of 2013, came to be passed as early as on 18.07.2013, and thereafter, the first respondent / Statutory Authority has considered the claim made by the petitioners and granted the relief of permanent status, vide order, dated 21.01.2015 and admittedly, the said order has not been put to challenge and therefore, the stand of the respondents is wholly unsustainable and prays for appropriate orders. 5. This Court heard the submissions of Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 6. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court, vide order, dated 18.07.2013 made in W.P.No.19389 of 2013, has set-aside the order of the first respondent and has remanded the matter for fresh adjudication and in compliance of the order, the first respondent has adjudicated the issue and vide order, dated 21.07.2013, has conferred the permanent status of the petitioners and 19 others and the said order has not been put to challenge. Therefore, the stand taken by respondents 2 and 3 in their order, dated 11.05.2015, that they are taking steps to prefer the appeal against the order, dated 18.07.2013 made in W.P.No.19389 of 2013, on the face of it, appears to be untenable. 7. Therefore, this Court, without going into the merits or otherwise of the matter and in the light of the above facts and circumstances, directs respondents 2 and 3 to take necessary steps to comply with the order, dated 27.01.2015 made in Case No.240 of 2013 passed by the first respondent, as expeditiously as possible and not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar srk To 1. The Labour Inspector, Under T.N.Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035 2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003 3. The Chief Engineer, Mechanical Department, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai – 600 003 +1cc to Mr.P.V.Selva Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.40665 +1cc to M/s.N.Valliamma, Advocate, S.R.No.40766 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.40943 W.P.No.24178 of 2015 SV(CO) CA(01/09/2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/