SITA RAM MEENA S/O NARAYAN MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/24/2025 · 2025-05-06
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4650 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4650 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19031-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 24/2025 Sita Ram Meena S/o Narayan Meena, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 35, Shivaji Nagar, Sanganer, Pratap Nagar Sector-11, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, (East), Gopalpura Mode, Jaipur.
3. The S.h.o., Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur.
4. Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, R/o Sun Flower Colony, Near Mahima Banas, Dakotiya Ki Dhani, Kheda Ka Rama, Sanganer, Jaipur.
5. Ramji Lal Meena S/o Late Shri Narayan, R/o Sun Flower Colony, Near Mahima Banas, Dakotiya Ki Dhani, Kheda Ka Rama, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manu Pancholi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, AGA Mr. Abhinav Sharma through V.C. Mr. Sriniwas, SHO, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 06/05/2025
1. This petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus is filed for production of daughter of the petitioner.
2. As per the pleadings, the daughter of the petitioner was kidnapped by Dinesh Kumar Meena.
[2025:RJ-JP:19031-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-24/2025]
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has produced the status report dated 05.05.2025, photocopy of the application and recorded statement of the petitioner.
4. From perusal of the statement and status report, it is forthcoming that the detenue had made a phone call to the petitioner on 13.04.2025 and informed that she has solemnized the court marriage. The petitioner in his statement stated that the phone call was of the detenue and she was freely talking and informed that she on her own sweet will has solemnized the court marriage.
5. In view of the subsequent development, no further orders are called for.
6. The habeas corpus petition is disposed of.
7. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law for redressal of surviving grievance, if any.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Sudeepak/32