Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46491 (RAJ)

KISHAN SINGH S/O. SHRI TUNDARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15936/2025 · 2025-10-16

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15936/2025 Kishan Singh S/o. Shri Tundaram, Aged About 68 Years, R/o. Village Nagla Pachaura, Tehsil Weir, Distt. Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Engineer (Adm.), Public Health And Engineer Department, Jalbhawan, Jacab Road, 2-Civil Lines, Jaipur. 3. Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineer Department, Circle -Bharatpur 4. Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineer Department, Nagar Division, Distt. Bharatpur 5. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health And Engineer Department, Sub-Division-Roopwas, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Singhal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Ms. Saba Naaz HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by the petitioner with following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the present writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate writ. order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner seeking the post of Helper and its all benefits w.e.f. granting the same benefits to similarly situated persons [2025:RJ-JP:44149] (2 of 3) [CW-15936/2025] and accordingly, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the post of Helper and its all benefits w.e.f. granting the same benefits to similarly situated persons in the interest of justice. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems expedient in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG accept notice on behalf of the respondents. Office is directed to reflect her name in the cause list. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while referring order dated 29.08.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14589/2019 : Virendrapal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Submits that the petitioner be given a liberty to file appropriate representation in light of circular dated 08.03.2022. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in disposing of the writ petition. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the [2025:RJ-JP:44149] (3 of 3) [CW-15936/2025] petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/45