Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46490 (PAT)

Asif Khan @ Md. Ashif Khan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./36104/2025 · 2025-06-30

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36104 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Asif Khan @ Md. Ashif Khan S/o Md. Islam Khan Residents of Mohalla- Bibi Bagaan Lane, Near Ekta Building, P.S.- Entally, Tengra, Kolkata- 15 (West Bengal)-700015 2. Mabiya Kamal @ Mawia Islam w/o Kamal Hasan, D/o Md. Islam Khan Residents of Mohalla- Bibi Bagaan Lane, Near Ekta Building, P.S.- Entally, Tengra, Kolkata- 15 (West Bengal)-700015 3. Shazia Islam W/o Nabab, D/o Md. Islam Khan Residents of Mohalla- Bibi Bagaan Lane, Near Ekta Building, P.S.- Entally, Tengra, Kolkata- 15 (West Bengal)-700015 4. Kamal Hasan @ Bhajju S/o Jabi Hasan @Nabi Hasan @ Nabi Hassan Residents of Mohalla- Bibi Bagaan Lane, Near Ekta Building, P.S.- Entally, Tengra, Kolkata- 15 (West Bengal)-700015 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Musarat Khatun @ Musarrat Fatima W/o Md. Shahid Khan R/o Mohalla - 13 Bibi Baggan Lane, Near Ekta Building, P.s.- Entally, Tengra, Kolkata, W.B ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 30-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Petitioners are in-laws members of opposite party no. 2 and there is allegation of matrimonial cruelty and demand of dowry against petitioners. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36104 of 2025(2) dt.30-06-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is Devar, petitioner no. 2 & 3 are married Nanad and petitioner no. 4 is Nandosi of opposite party no. 2. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the affairs of couple. Thrust of the allegation is against husband of opposite party no. 2. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 245 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T