- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 200067 OF 2025 (GM-PP) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 203865 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203867 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203869 OF 2024(GM-CPC) WRIT PETITION NO. 203870 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203871 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203873 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203875 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203876 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203877 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203878 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203879 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 203901 OF 2024(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200068 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200070 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200071 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200072 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200073 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200074 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200075 OF 2025(GM-PP) Digitally signed by NIJAMUDDIN JAMKHANDI Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS WRIT PETITION NO. 200076 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200077 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200078 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200080 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200081 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200082 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200083 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200406 OF 2025(GM-PP) WRIT PETITION NO. 200434 OF 2025(GM-PP) IN W.P.NO.200067/2025: BETWEEN: SRI. TINKU NAHAR S/O FAKRICHAND JAIN, AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 13/B, BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974 IN M.A.NO.5025/2024. IN W.P.NO. 203865 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. M. KISHORE S/O M. LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGE. 43 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 20 BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/22 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5019/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-M PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203867 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SMT. V. SAVITRI W/O V CHANNAMALLESHWARAO, AGE. 51 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 24, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/28 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5012/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-M PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES (E.U.O) ACT 1974 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 203869 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. K. RAGHU NATHA REDDY S/O VIDYA SAGAR REDDY, AGE: 60 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 12, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/12 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5013/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-N, PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203870 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SMT. C.H. SATYAVATHI W/O C.H. RAJU AGE: 39 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO.05, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/05 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5018/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-N PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES (E.U.O) ACT 1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203871 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. SRIDHAR S. KAKANI S/O SUBRAHMANYAM KAKANI, AGE. 43 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 02, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, - 8 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/02 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5021/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203873 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. GAJANAN RAIBAGI S/O RAJANSA RAIBAGI AGE. 50 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 15, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) - 9 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/17 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5017/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 203875 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. DARISI VENKATA SHESHAGIRIGUPTA D. VENAKATARATNAM AGE. 54 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 19, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) - 10 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/21 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5027/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203876 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. SAVALA RAM S/O RANCHOD RAM AGE. 40 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO.14, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) - 11 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/16 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5023/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES (E.U.O) ACT 1974 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 203877 OF 2024: BETWEEN: SRI. B RAJASHEKHAR S/O B VENKATA RAO AGE. 54 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO.18, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 - 12 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/20 (SHOP NO. 18) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5015/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203878 OF 2024: BETWEEN: N N MOHAMMED ALI S/O S N SULAIMAN AGE. 48 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 21, BDO COMPLEX, - 13 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/25 (SHOP NO. 21) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5037/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 203879 OF 2024: - 14 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS BETWEEN: SRI. D VENKATESWARLU S/O D V KRISHNAIAH AGE. 49 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 01, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR DIST. RAICHUR 584128 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,. SINDHANOOR TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/01 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN MA NO. 5026/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES(E.U.O) ACT-1974 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 203901 OF 2024: - 15 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS BETWEEN: SRI. BASAVARAJ S/O AYYANAGOUDA, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO.20/A, BDO COMPLEX, OPP COURT, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANOOR, THROUGH IT'S EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANOOR, TQ. SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.06.2024 IN BEARING NO. TPS/MALIGE/EN/2024-25/187/23 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J, AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN M.A.NO.5022/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-L. PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES (E.U.O) ACT 1974 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 200068 OF 2025: - 16 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS BETWEEN: N SRINATH S/O N GOPAL AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 10, BDO COMPLEX OPPOSITE COURT SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16-12-2024, AT ANNEXURE-H, PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN- AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5038/2024. IN W.P. NO. 200070 OF 2025: - 17 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS BETWEEN: RAJENDRA KUMAR NAHAR S/O UTTAMCHAND NAHAR AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO 17 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5036/2024. - 18 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS IN W.P.NO. 200071 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. M MAHESH S/O M VEERABHADRAYYASWAMI AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 16 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5014/2024. - 19 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS IN W.P.NO. 200072 OF 2025: BETWEEN: K VEERARAJU S/O K BHASKARRAO AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 11, BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5034/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200073 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SAJIDA BEGUM W/O MD ABDUL RAWOOF, - 20 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 13/A BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT. SINDHANUR DIST RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5020/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200074 OF 2025: BETWEEN: N V S RAMA MURTHY S/O VENKATSUBBIAH AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 22 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER - 21 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5028/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200075 OF 2025: BETWEEN: M V SUBBAIAH S/O VENKATESHWARALU, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 03 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) - 22 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5030/2024. IN W.P. NO. 200076 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. KEVAL CHAND S/O CHANDANMAL AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 26 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR 584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS - 23 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5024/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200077 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. KEVAL RAM S/O. BHALA RAMJI, AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. SHOP NO.06, BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, - 24 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5035/2024. IN W.P. NO. 200078 OF 2025: BETWEEN: MOHSIN PASHA S/O MOHAMAD AGE. 55 YEARS,OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 13 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR-584128. DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR 584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) - 25 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5039/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200080 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. M VENKATA REDDY S/O M SAVI REDDY AGE. 75 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SHOP NO. 23, BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR 584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT - 26 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5016/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200081 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. SAMARATRAM S/O MANGALARAM, AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 7 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT - 27 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5032/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200082 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. MD RASHEED PASHA S/O MURTUJA SAB, AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 20/B BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT - 28 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5031/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200083 OF 2025: BETWEEN: NAMADEVAGOUDA S/O CHATRAGOUDA AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 08 BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHYATH, SINDHANUR, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT - 29 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5033/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200406 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. MAFATLAL S/O HIMAMAL, AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 25, BDO COMPLEX, OPPOSITE COURT, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H, PASSED BY III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE - 30 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT, 1974, IN M.A.NO.5029/2024. IN W.P.NO. 200434 OF 2025: BETWEEN: SRI. MIRZA ZAFAR BAIG S/O M.G. BAIG AGE. 57 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O SHOP NO. 4, BDO COMPLEX OPPOSITE COURT SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KADLOOR SATYANARAYANACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SINDHANUR, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY III - 31 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS ADDL DIST AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAICHUR, SITTING AT SINDHANUR AND APPELLATE OFFICER UNDER KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES EVICTION OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS ACT 1974, IN M.A.NO.5040/2024. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ) In all these petitions, the petitioners who are tenants in shops belonging to the respondent No.1 have challenged an order passed by the respondent No.1 under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 (henceforth referred to as 'Act, 1974' for short) which was subsequently upheld in an appeal before the District Court. 2. The petitioners were all tenants in occupation of the commercial premises belonging to the respondent No.1. They were all inducted into the premises somewhere in the year 2010 for a period of 02 years 11 months. However, their occupation of the premises continued thereafter until all of them agreed for extension of the tenancy up to 30.11.2023. Thereafter, they made representations before the respondent - 32 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS No.2 for extension for another 02 years 11 months. They contend that the extension of tenancy for a further period of 11 months was under consideration before the State Government. In the meanwhile, the respondent No.1 initiated proceedings under the Act, 1974 and passed an order dated 01.06.2024 directing the tenants to quit and deliver vacant possession within 45 days from the date of publication of the order. These orders were challenged before the District Court in statutory appeals under Section 10 of Act, 1974. The District Court dismissed the appeals thereby confirming the order passed by the respondent No.1. 3. Being aggrieved by the said orders, the petitioners are before this Court. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the request of the petitioners for extension of the tenure is pending consideration before the State Government and therefore, the impugned order passed by the respondent No.1 and upheld by the District Court may be set at naught. They also contended that due to Covid -19, the petitioners could not - 33 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS conduct their business for nearly two years and therefore, the Government is considering the extension of the tenure. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submit that the proposal before the State Government was for extension of the tenure for 11 months commencing from 30.11.2023, which term also expired and the petitioners continued to occupy the premises as on date. He therefore, submits that the petitioners who have been in the premises for more than 14 years are liable to quit and deliver vacant possession. 6. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners be reserved the right to participate in the auction that may be held by the respondents and they may be reserved liberty to offer 5% more than the highest bidder and reserve their right to continue the tenancy. 7. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. - 34 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS 8. Since the term of the petitioners to occupy the commercial premises belonging to the respondent No.1 has come to an end, the petitioners are bound to quit and deliver vacant possession. The procedure contemplated under the Act, 1974 is fully complied and therefore the petitioners cannot allege that there is any irregularity in the process. The petitioners were unsuccessful in the appeal before the District Court and therefore, they are bound to deliver vacant possession of the premises in question. 9. It is also seen that the request of the petitioners for extension of time for a further period of 11 months commencing from 30.11.2023 was pending consideration before the State Government, which term has also expired and therefore, the petitioners do not have any right to continue in the premises. Therefore, these petitions are disposed off upholding the orders passed by the respondent No.1 as well as the District Court. 10. However, subject to the petitioners paying up all arrears of rent, they are granted liberty to participate in any tenders that may be invited by the respondents for auctioning - 35 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1254 WP No. 200067 of 2025 C/W WP No. 203865 of 2024 WP No. 203867 of 2024 AND 26 OTHERS the shops in their occupation. The petitioners shall if the law permits, offer 5% more than what is offered by the highest bidders to retain and continue their respective tenancy. 11. It is needles to mention that till the respondent No.1 take steps to auction the shops in question, the possession of the petitioners shall not be disturbed. It is made clear that if the petitioners do not participate in the tender or do not offer 5% more than what may be quoted by the highest bidder, they shall quit and deliver vacant possession of the respective premises within seven days from the date of auction and the respondents may use the required force to evict the petitioners. 12. The respondents shall conclude the auction process within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (R.NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 26 CT:SI