IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 102 Baljinder Singh and another Sh. Arun Sharma, Divisional Deputy Director, Rural Development and Panchayat, Patiala Division, Patiala CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to the respondent 19.12.2020 (Anne weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” Compliance Report dated Sharma, Divisional Patiala Division, Patiala COCP-1928-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1928 of 2025 Date of decision : Baljinder Singh and another Versus Arun Sharma, Divisional Deputy Director, Rural Development and Panchayat, Patiala Division, Patiala CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 06.8.2022 (Annexure P- Bench of this Court in CWP-17241-2022 and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to the respondent “….to decide the pending proposal dated 19.12.2020 (Annexure P-5) by passing a Speaking Order within four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” Learned counsel for the respondent Compliance Report dated 01.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Sharma, Divisional Director, Rural Development and Panchayat, Patiala Division, Patiala and submits that necessary compliance has 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1928 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-23.07.2025 …..Petitioners Arun Sharma, Divisional Deputy Director, Rural Development and Panchayat, Patiala Division, Patiala …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Advocate (through VC) Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying -1) passed by a co-ordinate 2022 titled as “Baljinder Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was “….to decide the pending proposal dated 5) by passing a Speaking Order within four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” Learned counsel for the respondent-State has filed the by way of affidavit of Shri Arun Director, Rural Development and Panchayat, submits that necessary compliance has VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.24 17.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document been made, while passing a speaking order dated respondent; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. 01.7.2025 taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper- passed in the present petition, the same is aforesaid Speaking Order as per law. July 23, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1928-2025 (O & M) been made, while passing a speaking order dated respondent; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid 01.7.2025 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in -book. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 been made, while passing a speaking order dated 17.6.2025 by the respondent; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. said Compliance Report dated produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the g application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.24 17.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document