PRAMOD SAINI S/O SHRI VIDYADHAR SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14699/2024 · 2025-12-02
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48975] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14699/2024 Pramod Saini S/o Shri Vidyadhar Saini, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No. 07, Kuwa Shishu Wala, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, At Present District Neem Ka Thana. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And Family Welfare Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Mission Director, National Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Additional Mission Director, National Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 02/12/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers:
“It is, therefore, most respectfully, prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased
to
call
for the entire record relating to this case and after pursuing the same maybe pleased
to
accept and allow this writ petition, and:
1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction respondents may kindly be
directed to include the petitioner who's completed more then 9 years in contractual services on the post of Health Mission Asha Supervisor
[2025:RJ-JP:48975] (2 of 2) [CW-14699/2024] under National include the petitioner is further and proceeding of direction letter dated 23.08.2024 and allow the petitioner to join his duty on the post of Sector Health Supervisor in the larger interest of justice.
2. Any other appropriate order, which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
3. Costs of the petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Considered submissions of learned counsel for parties and perused the material placed on record.
3. In view of appointment order dated 28.08.2023 (Annexure- 5) the petitioner has not joined his duty but as and when he offered to join his duty the respondent(s) have not permitted him to join duties and demanded medical certificate pursuant to order dated 18.10.2023.
4. Having considered aforesaid, there is no reason not to permit the petitioner to join his duty, as there is no subsequent order for termination, passed by the respondents for non-joining by petitioner pursuant to order dated 28.08.2023 (Annexure-5). Thus, the writ petition is allowed and the respondent(s) are
directed to afford opportunity to petitioner join pursuant to order dated 28.08.2023 within a period of two weeks from now.
5. In view of aforesaid, the writ petition and misc. application stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /266