IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36321 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Son of Anant Singh @ Anand Singh Resident of Village - Rajmaldih, Police Station - Sikarhatta, District - Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 16-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. 3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered 95 liters of illicit liquor from the house of one Jitendra Yadav. The police has also recovered 492.780 liters of illicit foreign liquor and 160 liters of illicit country-made liquor from the house of Suresh Singh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36321 of 2025(2) dt.16-06-2025 2/3 against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to personal grudge. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery made from the house of Suresh Singh as the same is open area, accessible to public at large and also not subject to private use of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 28.03.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, stating that the petitioner was arrested from the place of occurrence. 6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36321 of 2025(2) dt.16-06-2025 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T