Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46479 (RAJ)

LOKENDRA SINGH SOLANKI S/O KARAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18777/2025 · 2025-12-04

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49463] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18777/2025 1. Lokendra Singh Solanki S/o Karan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ridhi Sidhi Enclave, New Civil Lines, Kota Road, Baran, Rajasthan 2. Yogendra Prasad Trivedi S/o Shivnarayan Trivedi, Aged About 57 Years, R/o House No. 117, 118 A, Sarvodaya Nagar, Borkhera, Kota, Rajasthan 3. Babu Lal S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Shiv Colony, Anta, District Baran, Rajasthan 4. Jugal Kishore S/o Shri Ram Kishan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 941, Balaji Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Registrar, Revenue Board, Ajmer 3. Deputy Registrar (Land Records), Revenue Board, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- 1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to promote the petitioners on the post of Nayab [2025:RJ-JP:49463] (2 of 3) [CW-18777/2025] Tehsildar as per their seniority against the select year 2014-15. 2. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned Seniority List dated 10.10.2025 passed by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set and aside. 3. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to change the select year of petitioners on the post of ILR as year 2014-15 instead of year 2015-16 by creating shadow posts as the junior candidates have been placed above against the select year 2014-15 in the Seniority List. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:49463] (3 of 3) [CW-18777/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /115