Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46472 (RAJ)

MAHESH KUMAR SON OF MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6321/2025 · 2025-10-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6321/2025 Mahesh Kumar Son Of Mohan Lal, Resident Of Village Kudan, Police Station Dadiya, Tehsil Dhod District Sikar, Rajasthan. ( Presently In Central Jail Jodhpur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Represented Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Vidhyadhar Sihag S/o Shri Ramkumar, Resident Of Posani Balara, Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Sunit Gadwal S/o Shri Kajod Singh, R/o Laxman Ka Baas, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khedar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Himanshu for Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary Mr. Amit Gupta, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/10/2025 1. By way of filing this misc. petition, a prayer has been made to quash the FIR No.62/2023 registered with Police Station Udhyog Nagar(Sikar), District Sikar against the petitioner and the co-accused persons for the offences under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC and under Sections 4, 5 & 6 of the Price Chits & Money Circulation (Banning) Act, 1978 on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR was registered against several accused personal namely; Ranveer Singh, Subhash Chandra & Opendra Bijariniya with whom also (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6321/2025] compromise has taken place and on the basis of the compromise, they approached this Court by way of filing two different petitions bearing Criminal Misc. Petition Nos.7027/2023 and 4935/2025 and the same have been allowed by the co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 14.02.2024 and 01.09.2025 and proceedings of the instant FIR has been quashed qua those co- accused persons. Learned counsel submits that same order be passed in the instant case as well. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. 3. The complainant has put appearance in person, who has been duly identified by his counsel and has admitted the factum of compromise between the parties and the same has been verified by his counsel. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 5. In view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties and looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6321/2025] 6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. Proceedings arising out of impugned FIR No.62/2023, registered with Police Station Udhyog Nagar(Sikar), District Sikar for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC, against the petitioner stands quashed and set-aside. 7. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/25