ANGARA DATTATREYULU v. THE GOVT.OF A.P.COOP.DEPT. & 3 ORS
WP/14296/2004 · 2025-09-21
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010042532004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14296/2004 Between:
1. ANGARA DATTATREYULU, S/O.VENKATARAMAIAH, PAID SECRETARY, IRAGAVARAM PRIMARY AGRL.COOP.SOCIETY LTD., IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVT OF A P COOP DEPT 3 ORS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR/DISTRICT COOP OFFICER, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT.
3. THE DY REGISTRAR/DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, KOVUR, W.G.DIST.
4. THE IRAGAVARAM PRIMARY AGRL COOP SOCIETY LTD, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in placing me under suspension by its orders dated 27-07-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P.Cooperative societies Act and Rules made thereunder and consequently set aside the suspension orders dated 27-07- 2004 and reinstate the petitioner forthwith and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 18397 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 4th respondent dated 27-7-2004 in placing me under suspension, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V AJAYAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following:
ORDER:
On 04.09.2020, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter has been listed for dismissal. Despite such direction, the matter was not listed under the caption for dismissal.
Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 22nd September, 2025 RKS