[2025:RJ-JP:46630] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13079/2025 Karmveer Sharma @ Sonu S/o Shri Santosh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o House No. 135, Bhartendu Nagar, Khatipura, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi Mr. Yenu Satyam Mr. Virendra Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Sharvan Kumar, Inspector Cyber Crime HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.115/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station Commissionerate Jaipur, District Deputy Commissioner of Police Jaipur for offence under Sections 308(4), 111(2)(b), 111(3), 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegation against the petitioner is for sending a courier to Hari Boxer. He argued that no chat or call details have reportedly been [2025:RJ-JP:46630] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13079/2025] captured or seized in the matter by which link between the present petitioner and co-accused Hari Boxer can be established. He again submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 18.09.2025 without any criminal past. Therefore, the petitioner may be granted benefit of bail as the trial of the case may take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Karmveer Sharma @ Sonu S/o Shri Santosh Kumar Sharma, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/92