Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46462 (RAJ)

MATADIN S/O KURDA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16091/2025 · 2025-10-17

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42778] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16091/2025 1. Matadin S/o Kurda Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Ramlalpura, Post Sithal, Tehsil Gdhagaurji, District Jhunjhunu. 2. Mahaveer Prasad S/o Maduram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Ramlalpura, Post Sithal, Tehsil Gdhagaurji, District Jhunjhunu. 3. Mahendra Singh S/o Mohar Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Ramlalpura, Post Sithal, Tehsil Gdhagaurji, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Jhunjhunu. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. 4. Tehsildar Gudhagaurji, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 17/10/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the encroachment from land of Gair Mukin Nadi (River) bearing Khasra No.110, 113. 115, 147, 149/116, 150/118, 152/119, 153/138, 170/107, 171/108 and its catchment area bearing Khasra No.80 & 178/111 (Banjar) situated in Village Ramlalpura Patwar Halka Sithal, Tehsil Gudhagaurji District Jhunjhunu and take effective action against the land grabbers who raised encroachment upon the land of Nadi and its Catchment area. (iii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioners." [2025:RJ-JP:42778] (2 of 2) [CW-16091/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in this matter, the petitioner has submitted representation before the District Collector, Jhunjhunu, however, no heed was paid by Collector, Jhunjhunu to it. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioners to file representation(s) before Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. Mr. V. D. Gathala, learned Additional Government Counsel appears and accepts notices on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 4. Learned Additional Government Counsel has no objection if the present petition is disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 5. In that view of the matter, the present petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with the direction to the petitioners to file representation(s) before PLPC and it is further directed that PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioners, after giving audience to the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J SAHIL SONI /5