APHC010284372023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14616/2023 Between: 1. PITTA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/ O RATNA KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O 3-93, MAIN VILLAGE, GANGANAPALLI, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA.DIST. 2. M. UDAY KUMAR,, S/ O M.DHARMA RAJU, AGED 30 YEARS, R/ O 3- 95,S.C.COLONY, GANGANAPALLI, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 3. P. NAGESWARA RAO,, S/ O P. NAGANNA, AGED 64 YEARS, R/ O 2- 8, GANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 4. PANPANASUBBA RAO,, S/ O P NAGANNA, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O 1- 134/1, SC COLONY, GANGANAPALLI, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. GOTURI VEERA BABU,, S/ O LATE GOTURIMARIDAYYA, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O 3-21, GANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 6. AMALADASU RAGHAVA,, S/O. LATE AMALADASUAPPALASWAMY, R/O. D.NO. 3-20, GANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, 2 VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT,KAKINADA. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DIVISION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLEINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, INDRAPALEM POLICE STATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P VIVEK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14616 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' lands bearing plot Nos. 52, 58, 51, 70,140, 141 admeasuring Ac 0.03 cents each in RS Nos. 89 and 90 of Ganganapalli village, Kakinada Rural Mandal, Kakinada District and further threatening the petitioners to vacate the lands at the behest of third parties as illegal, highhanded, arbitrary, against law, unjust and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to not interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of plot Nos. 52, 58, 51, 70,140, 141 admeasuring Ac 0.03 cents each in RS Nos. 89 and 90 of Ganganapalli village, Kakinada Rural Mandal, Kakinada District …= 2. Heard Sri P.Vivek, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land and threatening to vacate the petitioners from their land. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that in view of the interim order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Order dated 21.06.2023, the police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 3rd parties. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 14616 of 2023 Dated.10.12.2025 UPS 196