APHC010349662006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. GANGISETTI SRAVAN KUMAR, S/O.SUBBAIAH, B4/56, PULICOT NAFE, AULLUEPWR, NWLLOEW SIAREIXR. 1. THE DIRECTOR AND 2 OTHERS, GNT ROAD, M.M.MUDI, KOTAPOLUR, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THE D GCUMSITE INCHARGE, ASIAN ROAD, M.M.MUDI, KOTAPOLUR, SULLURPET, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, GUNTUR. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, or any other appropriazte writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to I.D.No.177 of 2001 on the file of the Labour Court, Guntur, and quash the same, incuding the award rendered by its therein dt.25.1.2005, published on 19.1.2006 vide G.O.Rt.No.65 Labour Employ (Lab.I) Department, confirming dismissal order passed by the first respondent vide letter No. APL/SPT/PA/2001/071 dt.06th June, 2001, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of consequently, direct the first respondent management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service backwages and all other attendant benefits together with interest at 12% per annum on the arrears from the due date till the date of realisation. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 8251 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing the writ petition as employment for the last six years and could not get alternative appointment until he is reinstated into service in the 1st respondent company. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6462/2006 GANGISETTI SRAVAN KUMAR, S/O.SUBBAIAH, B4/56, PULICOT NAFE, AULLUEPWR, NWLLOEW SIAREIXR. ...PETITIONER AND THE DIRECTOR AND 2 OTHERS, GNT ROAD, M.M.MUDI, KOTAPOLUR, NELLORE DISTRICT. THE D GCUMSITE INCHARGE, ASIAN PEROXIDES LTD., GNT ROAD, M.M.MUDI, KOTAPOLUR, SULLURPET, NELLORE DISTRICT. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, or any other appropriazte writ or direction more ature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to I.D.No.177 of 2001 on the file of the Labour Court, Guntur, and quash the same, incuding the award rendered by its therein dt.25.1.2005, published on 19.1.2006 vide G.O.Rt.No.65 Labour Employment Training and Factories (Lab.I) Department, confirming dismissal order passed by the first respondent vide letter No. APL/SPT/PA/2001/071 dt.06th June, 2001, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of consequently, direct the first respondent management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service backwages and all other attendant benefits together with interest at 12% per annum on the arrears from the due f realisation. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 8251 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing the writ petition as the petitioner is out of employment for the last six years and could not get alternative appointment until he is reinstated into service in the 1st respondent company. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI GANGISETTI SRAVAN KUMAR, S/O.SUBBAIAH, B4/56, PULICOT ...PETITIONER THE DIRECTOR AND 2 OTHERS, GNT ROAD, M.M.MUDI, PEROXIDES LTD., GNT ROAD, M.M.MUDI, KOTAPOLUR, SULLURPET, NELLORE DISTRICT. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, or any other appropriazte writ or direction more ature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to I.D.No.177 of 2001 on the file of the Labour Court, Guntur, and quash the same, incuding the award rendered by its therein dt.25.1.2005, published on ment Training and Factories (Lab.I) Department, confirming dismissal order passed by the first respondent vide letter No. APL/SPT/PA/2001/071 dt.06th June, 2001, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of Inida, and consequently, direct the first respondent management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service backwages and all other attendant benefits together with interest at 12% per annum on the arrears from the due Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to the petitioner is out of employment for the last six years and could not get alternative appointment until he is reinstated into service in the 1st respondent company. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 8157 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix an early date for final hearing in the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. VEDULA SRINIVAS The Court made the following: ORDER Ms.S.Mahaswetha, learned counsel, representing Sri M. Ravindra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that she has instructions from the petitioner that the respondent firm was closed and hence this writ petition may be closed giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue his grievance before approprirate forum as and when cause arises. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum, if necessity arises. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR