Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46445 (ALL)

MAHENDRA KUMAR RAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/7769/2025 · 2025-04-22

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61057-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7769 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Rav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harsh Tiwari,Sudhesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard Shri Harsh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Tripathi, learned State Law Officer for the State-respondents. 2. In pith and substance, the petitioner is praying for a direction to the respondent (Superintendent of Police, Chandauli) to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 11.07.2024 for closer of his alleged History Sheet No. 47-A and surveillance of the petitioner by the Police Station Chakiya, district Chandauli. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid application was filed as far back as 11.07.2024, and despite the lapse of a considerable amount of time, it has not yet been processed. This situation has compelled the petitioner to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court. He has placed reliance upon the judgment dated 28.07.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 14159 of 2019 (Mohd. Nafees Khan vs. State of U.P. and others), and submits that a direction be issued to the Superintendent of Police, Chandauli, to decide the petitioner's application in accordance with law. 4. Learned State Law Officer on the other hand states that in case any such application is pending and the same is in consonance with law, definitely the competent authority shall pass appropriate orders on the same strictly in accordance with law. 5. Considering the factual situation, we are not inclined to keep the matter pending for consideration. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner's application is still to be processed, it shall be done in light of the judgment passed in Mohd. Nafees Khan (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 NLY (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad