Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010176042008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 235/2008 Between:
1. MUNAGOTI PADMAVATHI, W/O.RAMA KRISHNA, HINDU C/O.TATINADA LAKSHMAIAH, CHENNAMVARI STREET, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR. ...APPELLANT AND
1. MUNAGOTI RAMA KRISHNA, S/o.Amaraiah, Hindu Employee, Urban Land Ceiling Office O/o.5th Line, Arundelpet, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 359 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 15 days in filing the FCA against the judgement and decree passed in HMOP No.7/2008 on the file of the Family Court, Guntur dated 01.07.2008 IA NO: 2 OF 2008(FCAMP 447 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend thee operation of the decree and judgement passed in HMOP No.7/2008 on the file of the Family Court, Guntur dated 01.07.2008 pending disposal of the main appeal Counsel for the Appellant:
2
1. M JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K V R KRISHNA SHARMA The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.235 of 2008 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 13.08.2025, when this matter was listed, there was no representation on either side. Accordingly, this matter was posted to 03.09.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 10.09.2025, this matter was again listed. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, it was posted to today. Today also, there is no representation. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. 2. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
__________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:24.09.2025 SCS
4
179
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.235 of 2008
Dt.24.09.2025 SCS