Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46430 (AP)

Bokka Kiran v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14384/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010246852021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14384/2021 Between: 1. BOKKA KIRAN, S/O DAVID LIVINGSTONE, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC- GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.11-3-12, AMRUTHAVARSHINI NILAYAM, RAJULA COLONY, WARD NO.9, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. MOPARTHY JAYA RAO, S/O KRUPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE IN EXCISE DEPARTMENT, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. VEJENDLA BABU RAO, S/O LATE CHINA GEORGE, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.26-20-181, SIVA RAMA NAGAR, 7TH LANE, CHUTTUGUNTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. CHILAKA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, EXCISE CONSTABLE, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. GUNDAVALLI GANGADHAR RAO, S/O PRASADA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, MEMBER OF SC ST VIGILANCE MONITORING COMMITTEE, R/O D.NO.10-11-24/1, 12TH WARD, NIDUBROLU VILLAGE, PONNUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. BOKKA NAGABHUSHANAM, S/O BOKKA ISMAIL, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC- DRIVER, R/O PANITHAM POST, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 herein in not Investigating and filing Charge Sheet against the Accused Persons arrayed in FIR No.30 of 2021, dated 30.01.2021, on the file of the 3rd Respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 herein to Investigate and file Charge Sheet in FIR No.30 of 2021, dated 30.01.2021 on the file of the 3r.d Respondent herein, forthwith in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Sri C.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the respondent/police to conclude the investigation in Crime No.30 of 2021 and file a final report. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed to conclude the investigation in the above crime and file a report in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not finalize the investigation by this date. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14384 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr