Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4643 (ORI)

AJAYA KUMAR ROUT v. USHA PADHEE, IAS,COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,ODISHA

CONTC/6336/2025 · 2026-01-22

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.6336 of 2025 Ajaya Kumar Rout ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - M/s Dinesh Kumar Panda , A.k.mishra 2 -versus- Usha Padhee, IAS, Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties/ Contemnors Represented by Adv. – D.K. Sahu, A.G.A. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 22.01.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. 3. The present contempt application has been filed at the instance of the Petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 22.03.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.38360 of 2021. Page 2 of 3. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset contended that being aggrieved by order dated 22.03.2024, the State-Opposite Parties preferred a writ appeal bearing W.A. No.848 of 2024. He further contended that such writ appeal has been disposed of vide order dated 30.07.2025 thereby confirming the order passed by this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that after dismissal of the writ appeal by order dated 30.07.2025 the State- Opposite Parties preferred an SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court bearing SLP(C) No.035488/2025. 6. Today in course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner filed a memo along with the instruction from the official website of the Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein it has been indicated that the SLP has been dismissed by order dated 15.01.2026. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the order dated 22.03.2024 passed by this Court has already attained finality. However, the same has not been implemented by the Opposite Parties. Such conduct of the Opposite Parties is a clear act of wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 7. Taking into consideration the fact that the order dated 22.03.2024 has already been confirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 15.01.2026, this Court, as a last chance, grants two months’ time to the Opposite Parties-Contemnors to ensure that the order passed this Court is implemented in its letter and spirit, failing which, the Contemnors shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against Page 3 of 3. them for wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the contempt petition is disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer