26.03.2025 sayandeep Sl. No. 66 Ct. No. 28 WPA 27613 of 2024 Mohammad Ali Versus The State of West Bengal & ors. Mr. Ashim Kr. Routh Ms. Ananya Mondal Mr. Subhyan Barik ….. for the petitioner Mr. Jahar Lal De Ms. Debarati Sen (Bose) ….for the State Affidavit-of –service filed today be kept on record. The respondents are represented. There is no representation on behalf of the respondent No. 5 despite service. Learned advocate appearing for the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged highhanded and illegal action on the part of the respondent No. 5 in taking possession of the writ petitioner’s property which according to the writ petitioner was not mortgaged with the respondent No. 5. After having argued the case for some time, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail of appropriate civil remedy. Such leave is granted and the writ petitioner is allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate civil proceedings before the appropriate Court of law. (Om Narayan Rai, J.)