-1- 2025:CGHC:16007 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4787 of 2019 M/s Mahalaxmi Industries Parri, Surajpur, Through Its Proprietor- Smt. Preeti Jain W/o Shri Bajrang Jain, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Main Road, Parri, Surajpur, District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2- The Collector District Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 3- Chief Executive officer Zila Panchayat, Surajpur, District Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 4- Chief Executive officer Janpad Panchayat, Ramanujganj, District Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) with WPC No. 4789 of 2019 M/s Mahalaxmi Industries Parri, Surajpur, Through Its Proprietor - Smt. Preeti Jain W/o Shri Bajrang Jain, Aged About 44 Years, Resident of Main Road, Parri, Surajpur, District Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner Versus Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive officer Zila Panchayat, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive officer Janpad Panchayat, Pratappur, District Surajpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : Mr. Ali Asgar and Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04.04.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to file duly constituted civil suit for recovery of fund before the competent civil Court. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. 4) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim