1 2025:CGHC:1069 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 55 of 2025 1 - Amarbati Bai W/o Bhajandas Vaishnav Aged About 65 Years Caste Bairagi, R/o Village Bharritola, Gram Panchayat Bharritola (B), Tahsil Churiya, Police Station Bagnadi, District Rajandgaon (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 3 - Sub-Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue), Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 4 - Tahsildar, Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 5 - Chief Executive OfÏcer, Janpad Panchayat Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 6 - Rewaram Ladikar, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Bharritola (B), Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 7 - Budharu Ram S/o Rakbar, Up-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Bharritola (B), Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.01.08 23:04:05 +0530 2 8 - Kumbhlal Chandravanshi, Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Bharritola (B), Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 9 - Nandlal S/o Dwarika, Ward Panch, Gram Panchayat, Bharritola (B), Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 10 - The Sub- Registrar, Registrar OfÏce, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) CAUSE TITLE TAKEN FROM CIS PERIPHERY For Petitioner(s) : Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate with Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 08.01.2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to take appropriate action against the respondent No. 6 to 9 who are ofÏce bearer of the Gram Panchayat Bharritola (B), District Rajnandgaon, as they have boycotted the petitioner from all the activities in the village and the Panchayat. The ofÏce bearer of the Panchayat have warned the whole village not to make any relation with the family member of the petitioner herein. 3. Learned counsel for the State on advance copy submits that the allegations are very serious in nature and the Collector as well as the SDO shall look into the allegations levelled by the petitioner 3 against the respondent no. 6 to 9 and necessary steps shall be taken immediately. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the petitioner as well as the respondent, it is directed that the Collector Rajnandgaon personally look into the matter and ensure that the constitutional right of the petitioner under the Constitution of India shall not be violated by any authority including the Panchayat and its ofÏce bearers and necessary steps be taken immediately on the allegation levelled by the petitioner by examining the fact and allegation against the respondent No. 6 to 9. 5. With the aforesaid direction and observation, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib