Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46404 (PNJ)

SUSHAN GUPTA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/10859/2025 · 2025-04-22

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-10859-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10859-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.04.2025 Sushan Gupta .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Kamboj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Avin Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.3-GMADA. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner have sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the official respondents to take action against respondent No.5 for raising illegal construction in the courtyard and internal wall of house No.506, situated at Chandigarh Royale Estate/City, Banur, Tehsil Mohali, District S.A.S. Nagar. A further prayer has been made to remove the said illegal construction raised by respondent No.5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made a representation dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) to the competent authorities for AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10859-2025 (O&M) -2- redressal of his grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with his concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Ms. Avin Sandhu, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.3- GMADA and submits that the said representation shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-GMADA (competent authority), to look into the pending representation dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 22.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document