APHC010449202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22815/2025 Between: 1. DUDDU VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O RAMANADHAM (LATE), AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O 27-2-25, CHEJARLA LAKSHMANA CHARI STREET, NEAR SOUTH STREET, ONGOLE,PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. DUDDUSEETHARATNAM,, S/O RAMANADHAM (LATE), AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O 27-2-25, CHEJARLA LAKSHMANA CHARI STREET, NEAR SOUTH STREET, ONGOLE,PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, OPP. CHURCH CENTER, ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): -2- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in a) giving markings to petitioners undivided Joint family property i.e 17.6 Sq. yards of land including a G plus 1 RCC building bearing Door No. 37-1-108, Assessment No. 1035027751, T.S. No. 511, Trunk Road, Ongole Prakasam District, b) pressurising the 1st petitioner to accept TDR certificates by handing over the said property to the 2nd respondent for proposed road widening of the Trunk Road from Church Centre to Keerthi Medical Shop to a width of 100 feet as per the Master Plan, and c) initiating steps to demolish said property of the petitioners by dispossessing from the land, without following the procedure under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the possession and ownership of Petitioners over their property without following the procedure contemplated under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP -3- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.22815 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The present writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the 2nd respondent in a giving markings to petitioners undivided Joint family property i.e., 17.6 Sq yards of land including a G + 1 RCC building bearing Door No.37-1-108, Assessment No.1035027751, T.S.No.511, Trunk Road, Ongole, Prakasam District, b) pressurizing the 1st petitioner to accept TDR certificates by handing over the said property to the 2nd respondent for proposed road widening of the Trunk Road from Church Centre to Keerthi Medical Shop to a width of 100 feet as per the Master Plan and c) initiating steps to demolish said property of the petitioners by dispossessing from the land without following the procedure under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013, as arbitrary and illegal. 2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for Ongole Municipal Corporation. 3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court in -4- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 W.P.No.21175 of 2025 and requested to pass a similar order in this writ petition also. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. The operative portion of the said order, reads as under: “….the writ petition is disposed off directing the respondent authorities not to disturb the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s property without following due process of law, making it further clear that the respondent authorities shall have to follow the Act 30 of 13 while acquiring the land of the petitioner.” 4. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this writ petition is also disposed of, in terms of the order, dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.21175 of 2025. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. Registry is directed to annex a copy of the order in W.P. No.21175 of 2025 to the order in the present writ petition. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt.24.09.2025 NKA -5- HN, J W.P.No.22815_2025 369 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22815 of 2025 Date: 24.09.2025 NKA