Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46397 (AP)

Idupulapati Vardhini, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7323/2020 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010119602020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 7323/2020 Between: 1. IDUPULAPATI VARDHINI, W/O LATE I. NAGAMALLESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, FLAT NO. 401, SRI ANJANEYA RESIDENCY, GUNTUPALLI, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521 241. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOPF, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IBRAHIMPATNAM POLICE STATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM. KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned inaction of the 4th respondent official in proceeding with the registering thy complaint and proceeding with the investigation pursuant to the complaint submitted by me on 20.02.2020 and leading the same to its logical conclusion of bringing the culprits therein to a court of law for their conviction of their criminal acts against me and my properties as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unsustainable and is in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Articles 14 21 and the guarantee under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play, the dicta laid do in by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of UP and consequently direct the respondents to 2 initiate appropriate legal proceedings upon a thorough investigation under law so as to see that no anti social elements interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members in any manner whatsoever including trespassing into the private properties of the petitioner and effecting their privacy and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S ANAND Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief: <... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned inaction of the 4th respondent official in proceeding with the registering thy complaint and proceeding with the investigation pursuant to the complaint submitted by me on 20.02.2020 and leading the same to its logical conclusion of bringing the culprits therein to a court of law for their conviction of their criminal acts against me and my properties as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unsustainable and is in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Articles 14 21 and the guarantee under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play, the dicta laid do in by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of UP and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate legal proceedings upon a thorough investigation under law so as to see that no anti social elements interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members in any manner whatsoever including trespassing into the private properties of the petitioner and effecting their privacy and pass ....= Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that no complaint is received from the Petitioner and would submit that if any complaint is received from the Petitioner, respondent Police will take necessary action on the said complaint. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to take necessary steps if any complaint is received from the Petitioner. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 7323 of 2020 10.09.2025 Mjl/*