Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46395 (AP)

UMMDI SATYAVATHI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/31938/2022 · 2025-09-22

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010523922022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 31938/2022 Between: 1. UMMDI SATYAVATHI, W/O NOOKA RAJU AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE , R/O.36-94-303/7/1,RMAJI ESTATE ,KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNAM (URBAN),VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,AP 3. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, (G V M C ) GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SECTOR-3 ,STEEL PLANT ,TWP, VIZAG UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT -530032 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER R D 0, KANCHARAPALEM URBAN VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- On 29.09.2022 and 21.10.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 23.09.2025 SR