Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46391 (RAJ)

LOKENDRA SINGH S/O LATE SHRI MADAN MOHAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7728/2024 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49915] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7728/2024 Lokendra Singh S/o Late Shri Madan Mohan Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No.17, Azad Nagar, 60 Feet Road, Alwar, (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The District Education Officer, (Headquarter), Alwar (Rajasthan). 3. The Urban Chief Elementary Education Officer, Government Senior Secondary School, Railways Station, Alwar (Rajasthan). 4. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “By issuance of suitable Writ, Direction or Order in the nature thereof thereby the Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quashed and set-aside order/letter dated 21.03.2024 issued by the Respondent No. 2, the District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Alwar (Rajasthan) and further directed respondents to give appointment to the petitioner under the Rajasthan [2025:RJ-JP:49915] (2 of 3) [CW-7728/2024] Compassionate Appointment of Dependents Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 and Amended Rules, 2021 forthwith within a stipulated time period.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 16.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.200/2025 titled as Ravi Rawat Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Ravi Rawat Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Ravi Rawat Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:49915] (3 of 3) [CW-7728/2024] 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /117