SANJAY PRABHAKAR KALE, THR. P.O.A., RAJEEV PRABHAKAR KALE v. SAU. SMITA VIJAY CHAUHAN
WP/881/2025 · 2025-03-03
Shri Anil L Pansare
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46390 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46390 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14-WP-881-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 881 OF 2025 (Sanjay Prabhakar Kale Vs. Sau. Smita Vijay Chauhan) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. S.M. Vaishnav, Counsel for the petitioner. .....
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J.
MARCH 3, 2025 Having heard for some time, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the trial Court for seeking relief in terms of the location of plots as reflected in two sanctioned layouts; one that was sanctioned by the Additional Collector, Yavatmal, vide order dated 28/7/1992 and the other vide order dated 16/7/2002. 2] Permission is granted. The petition is
disposed of with liberty as prayed for. All questions are kept open. 3] The trial Court may consider the request to resolve the dispute, if there is no legal impediment.
(ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) Sumit 2025:BHC-NAG:2109