GULZAR AHMED NAIK AND OTHERS v. MANZOOR BEGUM TH HER HUSBAND AB RASHID BHAT
RSA/17/2025 · 2025-09-15
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4639 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4639 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: RSA No. 17/2025
Gulzar Ahmed Naik and Ors.
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Bari Abdullah, Advocate
Vs
Manzoor Begum .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Irfaan Khan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 15.09.2025
After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant appeal, learned counsel for the appellants seeks withdrawal of the instant appeal with liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law, as there is no substantial question of law involved in the instant appeal. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellants, the instant appeal is dismissed along with connected application(s) as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 15.09.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 15 Mihul Singh 2025.09.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document