APHC010034572019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: K A Kumar The State of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus Respondents in not sanctioning and paying the encashment of earned leave EL and half pay leave in accordance with the G and G.O.Ms.90, dated 08 Government of A.P on my retirement further not considering representations dated 05 the EL and HPL is arbitrary IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1595 OF 2019 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: C SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not sanctioning and paying the encashment of earned leave and half pay leave in accordance with the G.O.Ms.148 dated 21 dated 08.06.2018 Finance (HR-IV) Department issued by P on my retirement further not considering representations dated 05.09.2018 and 03.01.2019 seeking for encashment of the EL and HPL is arbitrary, illegal, violations of the law and violation of Art 14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of the inaction of the Respondents in not sanctioning and paying the encashment of earned leave 148 dated 21.08.2017 Department issued by P on my retirement further not considering petitioner’s 2019 seeking for encashment of violations of the law and violation of Art 14 and 19 of The Constitution of India further direct the respondent to pay the same by considering petitioner’s representations and pass such other orders”. 2. Heard Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical School Education for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and that petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.03.2025 KK