Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46385 (RAJ)

PRAHLAD YADAV S/O SHRI GENDA LAL YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6271/2020 · 2025-11-06

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44539] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6271/2020 1. Prahlad Yadav S/o Shri Genda Lal Yadav, aged about 43 Years, R/o Gram Chuwar Ka Bas, Tehsil Amber, Distt. Jaipur. 2. Raju Mali S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Mali, aged about 35 Years, R/o Gram Mothu Ka Bas, Police Thana Harmada Tehsil Amber Distt. Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Sunil Jaat S/o Shri Gopal Lal Jaat, aged about 22 Years, R/o Chuwar Ka Bas, Police Thana Harmada, Tehsil Amber Distt. Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/11/2025 1. Even in the second round, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Petitioners have filed this instant petition with a prayer to quash FIR No.412/2020 registered at Police Station-Harmada, District-Jaipur (West), for alleged offence under Section 392 IPC. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record one factual report dated 11.01.2021 prepared by the Station House Officer, Police Station-Harmada, District-Jaipur (West), in which it has been mentioned that after investigation no offence was found [2025:RJ-JP:44539] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6271/2020] to be made out against the petitioners. Hence, negative final report was prepared with the intention to file the same before the Court. 4. No one is there to controvert the aforesaid factual report on behalf of the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant has also not disputed in this regard. 6. In view of above, the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/9