[2025:RJ-JP:47301] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3975/2024 Dharmveer S/o Girraj Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Tusari Alwar, Rajasthan 321605 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 2. The State Project Director, Rajasthan Council Of School Education, Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, Rajiv Gandhi Vidhya Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Jaipur. 3. The Chief District Education Officer Cum Paden District Project Coordinator, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, Alwar. 4. The State Project Director And Commissioner, District Alwar. 5. The Principal, Peeo, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Tikri, Kathumar, District Alwar. 6. Kuldeep Kumar Jain, Coordinator Of Placement Agency, B.r. Street, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Budhhi Prakash Meena For Respondent(s) : None HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, thereby quashing the impugned order of dated 08.02.2024 issued by the Respondent no.4 by issuing writ or direction to quash the verbal termination of the petitioner by the respondents.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 31.07.2018 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.406/2018 titled as The Director, Tiger Project Vs. Labour Court and Anr. and connected [2025:RJ-JP:47301] (2 of 2) [CW-3975/2024] matters submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Notices were served upon all respondents but today no one is present on behalf of respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions and also considering the material placed on record, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to file a representation. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of The Director, Tiger Project Vs. Labour Court and Anr. (supra) with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /171