Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46379 (AP)

Garapati Venkata Nagendra prasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13851/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010241582021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13851/2021 Between: 1. GARAPATI VENKATA NAGENDRA PRASAD, S/O GARAPATI SUBBARAO,OCC-FARMER, R/O 5-24 MAIN ROADUPPALAGUPTAM,GODAVARI DIST-533222 2. GARAPATI SHIVA CHAITANYA,, S/O GARAPATI VENKATA NAGENDRA PRASAD R/O 5-24 MAIN ROADUPPALAGUPTAM,GODAVARI DIST-533222 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, UPPALAGUPTAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UPPALAGUPTAM, POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. GOVADA VENKATESWARA RAO, SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS 4TH RESPONDENT 6. GARAPATI ADITYA RANGA RAGHAVENDRA, S/O VENKATA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, R/O D.NO.4-4, UPPALAGUPTAM,EAST GODAVARI- 2 533222 7. GARIPATI RAJARAO, S/O SUBBARAO, RIO DO.NO.4- 61,UPPALAGUPTAM,EAST GODAVARI-533222 8. GARIPATI SUBBARAO, S/O RAJARAO, R/O DO.NO.4- 61,UPPALAGUPTAM,EAST GODAVARI-533222 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not investigating into the matter in Cr.71/2021 dt-28.05.2021 on the file of the Uppalaguptam Police Station, East Godavari District and not taking appropriate action against the unofficial respondents for their illegal acts is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the Fundamental Rights enshrined under the Constitution and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to investigate into the matter in Cr.71/2021 dt-28.05.2021 on the file of the Uppalaguptam-Police Station, East Godavari District and to take appropriate action against the unofficial respondents for their illegal acts, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection for the life and properties of the petitioners by preventing the unofficial respondents from interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over their property till finalization of the investigation into the matter in in Cr.71/2021 dt-28.05.2021 on the file of the Uppalaguptam Police Station East Godavari District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAJESH MATCHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAJESH MATCHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13851 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not investigating into the matter in Cr.71/2021 dt-28.05.2021 on the file of the Uppalaguptam Police Station, East Godavari District and not taking appropriate action against the unofficial respondents for their illegal acts is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the Fundamental Rights enshrined under the Constitution and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to investigate into the matter in Cr.71/2021 dt-28.05.2021 on the file of the Uppalaguptam-Police Station, East Godavari District and to take appropriate action against the unofficial respondents for their illegal acts, and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13851 of 2021 Dated.23.09.2025 UPS 82