[2025:RJ-JP:48165] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15419/2025 Harendra Gurjar S/o Dilip Gurjar, R/o Manpur, Police Station Kelari, District Dholpur, Working As Contract Employee, Municipal Council, Dholpur At Present Lodged In The Central Jail, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/11/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.237/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District, for offences punishable under Sections 7, 7A and 12 of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that co-accused namely- Neeraj Sharma and Priya Kumari have already been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is contended that charge-sheet has been filed in this case and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:48165] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15419/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that co- accused namely- Neeraj Sharma and Priya Kumari have already been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, so also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Harendra Gurjar S/o Dilip Gurjar shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /20