Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46374 (AP)

Vennapusa Malyadri Reddy v. .The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP(PIL)/25/2025 · 2025-12-02

Challa Gunaranjan, Dhiraj Singh Thakur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010057942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 25 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-1 [3552] Vennapusa Malyadri Reddy ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Gundala Siva Prasada Reddy Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development for R.2, GP for Revenue for R3, R5, R9 & R10 AGP for School Education for R.4, R.6 & R.11, Mr. Mattegunta Sudhir [Standing Counsel] for R.7, R.8 & R.12 CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 3rd December, 2025 P C : We have gone through the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.8 i.e., the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Ongole wherein it is stated that the land falling in Sy.No.119-3 to an extent of Ac.4.19 cents and Ac.0.04 cents falling in Sy.No.119-6 is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Zilla Parishad High School, Chennipadu and further that there was no encroachment on the said land. 2 HCJ & CGR, J WP(PIL)_25_2025 The affidavit further suggests that notices are issued to the concerned residents including the writ petitioner and the Head Master of the Zilla Parishad High School to attend the survey which was held on 11.04.2025. The survey is stated to have been conducted in the presence of village elders as also the Head Master. Be that as it may, in view of the affidavit so filed, we find no merit in the present petition, which is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J Vjl