- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2234 MFA No. 101596 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101596 OF 2018 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SARASWATI W/O. RAMKRISHNA PUJARI, AGE: 77 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, 2. SMT. JAYASHRI W/O. PRAKASH PUJARI, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, 3. KUMAR PRAVEEN S/O. PRAKASH PUJARI, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, 4. KUMAR SUNIL S/O. PRAKASH PUJARI, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, ALL ARE R/O: TIMMAPUR, TQ: AND DIST: BAGALKOT-587201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI S.S. YALIGAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NEMGOND S/O. DADU PATIL, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: OWNER OF TRACTOR AND TRAILOR, R/O: MAISHAL, TQ: MIRAJ, DIST: SANGALI-560101. 2. BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., OPP: GORAKASHAN, Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2234 MFA No. 101596 of 2018 TILAKNAGAR MAIN ROAD, LATUR-813531, STATE: MAHARASHTRA-513531. (TRACTOR NO.MH-29/C-2122. POLICE NO.231100/31/09/02/00015647 DATE 28/01/2010 TO 27/01/2011). 3. BRANCH MANAGER, BAJAJ ALIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., GE PLAZA, AIRPORT ROAD, YARAWAD, PUNE-411006, STATE: MAHARASHTRA-411006. TRAILOR NO.M.H. NO.10/W-844, TRAILOR NO.M.H. 10/W-843, POLICY NO.OG 10/-2005-5001-00000167, DATE 04/12/2009 TO 03/12/2010. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1998, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND CLAIM AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT OF RS.25,18,000/- WITH COST AND PROPER INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF PETITION, TILL THE REALIZATION OF AWARD AMOUNT AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND ACCORDINGLY MODIFY THE AWARD DATED 29.12.2017 PASSED BY THE MEMBER, MACT NO.III, BAGALKOT, IN MVC NO.196/2012, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ANY OTHER RELIEFS MAY KINDLY BE GRANTED. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2234 MFA No. 101596 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Though four opportunities were given for compliance of office objections, but have been not complied with. Today also for fifth time, the matter is posted for non compliance of office objections, but there is no representation for the appellant nor there is compliance of office objections. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 72