Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4637 (GAU)

Tallo Yamang v. The State of AP and 7 Ors

WP(C)/231/2025 · 2025-07-23

Budi Habung

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040008422025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/231/2025 Tallo Yamang Wife of Tage Tallang, presently posted as Assistant Surveyor of Works, ASW Rural Works Division, Namsai, PO and PS Namsai, District Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Ors through the Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Under Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Departmental Promotion Committee Age: 0 Occupation : for promotion of Junior Engineers to the post of Assistant Engineer in the Rural Works Department held its meeting on 19.08.2024 through its Chairman the Chief Secretary Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. Page No.# 2/3 5:Tate Padu Age: 0 Occupation : presently serving as Assistant Engineer Rural Works Circle Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Bullo Jarjo Age: 0 Occupation : presently serving as Assistant Engineer Rural Works Sub Division Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:Komba Tasso Age: 0 Occupation : presently serving as Assistant Engineer Rural Works Sub Division Kaying Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:Pugi Kambu Age: 0 Occupation : presently serving as Assistant Engineer Chief Office Rural Works Department (Western Zone) Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging, Tokge Darin,Kirmar Ado,Doge Lona,Marge Doji,Daina Tamuk Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC (RWD) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 24.07.2025 Mr. D. Lona, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition, to which, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. The prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant