Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 249-1. CWP-10637-2024 Date of Decision:11.08.2025 DR. VIJAY KUMAR
...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Vansh Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aakash Singla, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL)
1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has unfortunately expired, the petition has become infructuous.
2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 11.08.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal
JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.08.13 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh