Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46367 (KAR)

SMT NEELAMMA v. KRISHNA. M. N.

MFA/2905/2024 · 2025-02-18

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2905 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1 . SMT NEELAMMA W/O. LATE JAYAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO. 223, 12TH CROSS, KEB COLONY, CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGARA, MANDYA. JAYAKUMAR, S/O LATE CHIKKACHOWDAIAH, SINCE DEAD, BY HIS LRS. 2 . SMT. SHALINI. G. J. D/O. LATE JAYAKUMAR, W/O. MAHENDRA. J, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 71, 2ND CROSS, ADI SHAKTHI TEMPLE, GANDHINAGAR, RAMANAGARA. 3 . YASAWANTHRAJ. G. J. S/O. LATE JAYAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO. 232, 12TH CROSS, PUSHPAPANDURANGA KALYANA MANTAPA, CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGAR, MANDYA. ..APPELLANTS (BY SRIYUTHS. SHARATH S. GOWDA, MANJUNATH S., ARCHITHA SURESH, PRAHANSINGH H.P., MEGHANA D., ADVOCATES) MFA No. 2905/2024 ---------------------------- 2 AND: 1 . KRISHNA. M. N. SINCE DEAD BY LRS., (OWNER AND DRIVER OF VARNA CAR BEARING REG. NO. KA-51-ME-1446) SMT. U. C. LALITHA, W/O. LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 2 . M. K. SWETHA D/O. LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT SRI. NANJUNDESHWARA KRUPA, NARMADA NILAYA, 7TH CROSS, BESIDE AMBEDKAR BHAVANA, SUBHASH NAGARA, MANDYA. 3 . THE FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., 4TH FLOOR, WINDFALL, SAHAR PLAZA COMPLEX, ANDHERI KOLURU ROAD, J.B. NAGARA, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI. (POLICY NO. 2016-V4537882-FPV VALID FROM 03.07.2016 TO 02.07.2017) ..RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV ACT, against the Judgment and Award dated 02.11.2023 passed in MFA No. 2905/2024 ---------------------------- 3 M.V.C. No.856/2017 on the file of the PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CJM AND MACT, MANDYA partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated 18.02.2025, not complied with. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: AR R By: YL C By: RM