APHC010684552012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 412/2012 Between: 1. LAVETI APPALA NAIDU & 3 ORS, S/O.LATE VENKATAPPADU, HINDU CULTIVATION R/O.KONDAVALASA VILLAGE, SARABUJJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LAVETI SUBBA RAO, S/O.LATE VENKATAPPADU, HINDU CULTIVATION R/O.KONDAVALASA VILLAGE, SARABUJJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. LAVETI SURYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE VENKATAPPADU, HINDU CULTIVATION R/O.KONDAVALASA VILLAGE, SARABUJJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. LAVETI RAMA RAO, S/O.LATE VENKATAPPADU, HINDU CULTIVATION R/O.KONDAVALASA VILLAGE, SARABUJJILI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS ANR, SRIKAKULAM 2. SRI ANJANEYA TEMPLE, REP BY ITS TRUSTEES C/O.KELLA VEEDHI, SRIKAKULAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 841 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 JS,J C.M.A.No.412/2012 suspend the judgment / award and decree made in OA No.326/2011 dated 02.04.2012 on the file of the Hon'ble AP Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1691 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dated 23.05.2012 passed in CMAMP No.841/2012 in CMA No.412/2012 Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS 2. CH SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. . 3 JS,J C.M.A.No.412/2012 The Court made the following JUDGMENT: No representation for the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants requested time on 27.06.2025, 11.07.2025 and 07.08.2025. When the matter was listed on 29.08.2025, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the case. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.09.2025 KAS