RAMNIWAS S/O SHRI LAXMAN RAM v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/19790/2025 · 2025-12-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46357 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46357 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51153] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19790/2025 Ramniwas S/o Shri Laxman Ram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhojasar, Via Nua, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Chairman Cum Managing Director (Raj.)
2. The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jhunjhunu Depot, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/12/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“The impugned action of the respondents by which the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of selection scale /ACP from the due date may kindly be held as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of selection scale / ACP on completion of 9, 18 & 27 years of service, counting the length of service from the date of initial appointment and the respondents be also directed to calculate the arrears accrued thereof and be released with interest.”
2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 20.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10581/2023 titled as Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of
[2025:RJ-JP:51153] (2 of 2) [CW-19790/2025] this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is liable for disposal in light of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. (supra) and RSRTC and Anr. Vs. Tara Chand: DB Special Appeal Writ No.524/2018 (order dated 01.12.2021) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation.
After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /142