MOHAMMAD ISLAM S/O SUBHAN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12808/2025 · 2025-10-16
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46354 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46354 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12808/2025
1. Mohammad Islam S/o Subhan Khan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kharkhadi, Police Station Choupanki, District Khairthal-Tijara. (At Present Confined In District Jail Khairthal-Tijara).
2. Arsad S/o Subhan Khan, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Kharkhadi, Police Station Choupanki, District Khairthal- Tijara. (At Present Confined In District Jail Khairthal- Tijara).
3. Vajib Khan S/o Arsad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kharkhadi, Police Station Choupanki, District Khairthal- Tijara. (At Present Confined In District Jail Khairthal- Tijara). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Ankit Yadav and Mr. Mahendra Verma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 16/10/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioners in connection with FIR No.104/2025, registered at Police Station Choupanki, District Bhiwadi wherein they have been charged for offences punishable under Sections 115(5), 126(2), 118(2), 3(5) and 110 BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injured-Asgar has sustained one injury by sharp-edged weapon
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12808/2025] on his nose and the same has been inflicted by the accused- Islam. Counsel submits that the nose injury was not found to be dangerous and as per opinion of the Doctor, this injury could have been sustained by falling on surface. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been submitted and the petitioners are in custody and they are not having any criminal antecedents and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the injured has not sustained any grievous injury on vital party of his body and charge-sheet has been filed and the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS.
5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners Mohammad Islam S/o Subhan Khan, Arsad S/o Subhan Khan and Vajib Khan S/o Arsad arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12808/2025] Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/237