Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46352 (RAJ)

SATYANARAYAN SON OF LATE SHRI MADANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15854/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49046] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15854/2025 Satyanarayan Son Of Late Shri Madanlal, Resident Of Village Sinta, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareek For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.154/2025 registered at Police Station Nanta, District Kota City for offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegations levelled against the present petitioner are that he cheated the complainant and grabbed Rs.11,00,000/- on the pretext of selling land and by using forged receipts caused wrongful loss to complainant. He further averred that matter is purely civil in nature and petitioner has not received any amount and there is no direct transaction between the petitioner and the [2025:RJ-JP:49046] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15854/2025] victim. He again submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 28.11.2025, without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Satyanarayan Son Of Late Shri Madanlal be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR I),J Chandan/110