APHC010456462003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17062/2003 Between: 1. M.SRIRAM KUAMR, NARSAPUR,W.G.DIST&8, S/O. M.S.R.K.V.VAJJULU ATTENDER R/O. NARSAPUR WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. K.SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O. MEERAIAH ATTENDER 3. K.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. MARRAJU ATTENDER 4. B.V.V.SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA ATTENDER 5. I.SATYANAAYANA RAJU, S/O. GAVARARAJU ATTENDER 6. T.SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAJU NIGHT WATCHMA 7. A.LAKSHMI NARASIMHAM, S/O. SADGURU NIGHT WATCHMA 8. P.SRINIVAS, S/O. MUTYALA RAO NIGHT WATCHMAN 9. K.HANUMANTHU, S/O. SATYANARAYANA WATCHMAN ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DT COOP OFFICER ELURU W G DIST2 ORS, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE, SOCIETIES,BHIMAVARAM,W.G.DISTRICT 2 3. THE NARSAPUR COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD, NARSAPUR,W.G.DIST, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI.V.V.KUMAR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in R.C.No.2972/02- E/D dt.18.6.2003 and the consequential action of the 3rd respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner on the basis of te said proceedings even without issuing any notices what so ever is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 21194 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the services of the petitioners by suspending the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in R.C.No. 2972/02-E/D dt.18.6.2003 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO 2. 3. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 The Court made the following order: Sri K.Yaswanth, learned counsel, representing Sri Turaga Sai Surya, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that despite best efforts, they could not contact the petitioners. Since the matter pertains to the year 2003 and the petitioners have not been pursuing the case through their advocate, it shows that they have no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioners feel that the cause still survives, they can file an appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 26.09.2025 MP 4 226 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17062 of 2003 Dated: 26.09.2025 MP