Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46350 (RAJ)

RAMAVTAR SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMNARAYAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1028/2024 · 2025-11-25

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1028/2024 Ramavtar Sharma S/o Shri Ramnarayan Sharma, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 24, Shitla Mata, Chaksu, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Chief Secretary Administration, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionrate, Jaipur Metropolitan (Raj.) 5. Additional Director General Of Police, Civil Rites Department, Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Dayram Gurjar, Head Constable, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South. 7. Pawan Kumawat, I.A.S. 8. Ranjeet Singh, S.H.O., Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South. 9. Satish Kumawat, Through S.H.O., Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South. 10. Mukesh Kumawat, Through S.H.O., Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Malkhan Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Devi Singh, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/11/2025 1. The defect(s) pointed out by the Office stands waived. (2 of 2) [CRLW-1028/2024] 2. By way of filing this petition, the following prayer has been made: “A. By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature therein thereby restrained the police authority not given harassment to petitioners, provide police protection to petitioner and his family members of petitioner and amount should be recovered from the accuse and the accused should be punished by returning amount back to the petitioner in the larger interest of justice. B. Issue directions to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) or any other Magistrate to record the statements of petitioner. C. Any other relief which may deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 3. The relief sought for cannot be granted by this Court. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the accused persons, the petitioner is at liberty to file complaint before the competent Court of law for redressal of his grievances. 4. Accordingly, the instant criminal writ petition is dismissed with liberty aforesaid. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/316