MANNI BAI W/O HARIVALLABH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16942/2025 · 2025-11-19
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47275] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16942/2025 Manni Bai W/o Harivallabh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Todi Mohalla Chhabra, District Baran, Rajasthan (Currently Working As A Cook At The Government Children Hostel, Chhabra, District Baran, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 19/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to grant minimum pay scale of the post of Class-IV Servant and similar benefits should be given to the petitioner as per judgment of Writ Petition No.16428/2024 Rajesh Kumar Vs. State.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file
[2025:RJ-JP:47275] (2 of 2) [CW-16942/2025] an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the
order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /85