Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46342 (RAJ)

KALPESH DAHYABHAI PATEL S/O SHRI DAHYABHAI TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/958/2020 · 2025-11-27

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48202] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 958/2020 Kalpesh Dahyabhai Patel S/o Shri Dahyabhai Tribhovandas Patel, Aged About 46 Years, Director Of M/s Kota Baran Tollway Private Limited, C/o Prathvi Prasad Bunglow Nagar Park, Kolhapur 416003, Maharashtra. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Jitendra Prasad Mishra S/o Jagropan Mishra, R/o Kaharon Ka Mohalla, Kansua, Udyog Nagar, Kota City, Raj. ----Complainant-Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1272/2020 Laxman D. Jadhav S/o Shri D.S. Jadhav, Director, M/s Kota Baran Tollway Private Limited, C/o Prathvi Prasad Bunglow Nagar Park, Kolhapur-416003, Maharashtra. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP -----Respondent 2. Jitendra Rpasad Mishra S/o Jagropan Mishra, Resident Of Kaharon Ka Mohalla, Kansua, Udyog Nagar, Kota City, Rajasthan. ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.D. Bansal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/11/2025 These misc. petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.96/2019 registered at Police Station [2025:RJ-JP:48202] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-958/2020] Simaliya, District Kota Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 283 and 304-A of IPC. Learned Public Prosecutor places on record the factual report dated 31.10.2025 received from the SHO, P.S. Simaliya, District Kota Rural. According to which, after thorough investigation, police has filed negative final report against the petitioners before the concerned Court, which has also been accepted. The said report is hereby taken on record. In view of above, prayer made in these petitions does not survive anymore. Accordingly, these criminal misc. petitions as well as stay applications are dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/48-49