Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46341 (RAJ)

MUNNA URF ROOP SINGH S/O SHRI HARDAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12956/2025 · 2025-10-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42459] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12956/2025 1. Munna Urf Roop Singh S/o Shri Hardam, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Kaban Ka Bas, Police Station Khoh Presently Village Rabhana Police Station Shaikhpur, District Khairthal, Tijara. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Deeg). 2. Musddin S/o Shri Fakru, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kakrali Hall Gadhi Mewat Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Deeg). 3. Fakru @ Fakruddin S/o Sirdara, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kakrali Hall Gadhi Mewat Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mustak Ahmad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioners in connection with the FIR No.317/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari District Deeg wherein they have been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 121(1), 132, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) & 125 BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents and they have been in custody since 14.09.2025 and trial will take [2025:RJ-JP:42459] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12956/2025] its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents and also considering the fact that the petitioners have been in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners-Munna Urf Roop Singh S/o Shri Hardam, Musddin S/o Shri Fakru & Fakru @ Fakruddin S/o Sirdara arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/277