RAMESHWAR LAL S/O HUKMARAM v. SHRI BHASKAR A. SAWANT
CCP/1063/2025 · 2025-11-07
Uma Shanker Vyas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46340 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46340 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44660] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1063/2025 Rameshwar Lal S/o Hukmaram, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Village Shahpura, Tehsil Khandela (Present Tehsil Reengus), District Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Bhaskar A. Sawant, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Shri Mukul Sharma, (I.a.s.) District Collector, Sikar
3. Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Sub-Division Officer, Reengus, District Sikar
4. Mr. Vivek The Tehsildar, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar
5. Mr. J.p. Yadav, Executive Engineer, Pwd Reengus, District Sikar
6. Mr. Akhil Basker, Assistant Engineer, Pwd Division Reengus, District Sikar
7. Shri Ashok Kumar, Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Thikariya, Panchayat Samiti Thikariya, District Sikar
8. Smt. Saroj Devi W/o Shri Omprakash Poonia, (Administrative), Gram Panchayat Thikariya, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, District Sikar (Rajasthan)
9. State Of Rajasthan, Through Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretriat Jaipur, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
[2025:RJ-JP:44660] (2 of 3) [CCP-1063/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 07/11/2025 ,dyihB flfoy fjV fiVh'ku la[;k&10250@2025 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 10-07-2025 dh dfFkr vogsyuk o voekuuk ds laca/k esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gS] vkns'k dk lqlaxr Hkkx fuEukuqlkj gS%&
"5. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Panchayat by way of filing appropriate representation along with patta within a period of one week from today. In case, such representation is filed by him within the above stipulated time, it is expected from the Panchayat to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after providing him apporpriate apportunity of hearing, expeditiously as early as possible within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the action or by any adverse order, he would be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law. 7.
For a period of four weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner." fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd ftl fnu iapk;r }kjk dksje dh ehfVax gksuk crkbZ tk jgh gS] okLro esa ,slh dksbZ ehfVax ugha gqbZ gS] mlds vH;kosnu dk fuLrkj.k fof/k&fo:) rjhds ls fd;k x;k gS] vr% foi{khx.k dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s tkdj mfpr dk;Zokgh dh tkosA ;kph i{k dh vksj ls tks nLrkost izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa] mlds vuqlkj ;kph dh vksj ls vH;konsu izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk iapk;r ds dksje ds le{k lquokbZ ds ckn mls vfrØeh ekurs gq, mls vfrØe.k gVk;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gSA mijksDr vkns'k ls ;kph O;fFkr gS rks
[2025:RJ-JP:44660] (3 of 3) [CCP-1063/2025] fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj Lora= :i ls dk;Zokgh gsrq Lora= gS vkSj ;g Lora=rk vkns'k fnukad 10-07-2025 ds ek/;e ls ;kph dks nh xbZ gSA laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ikfjr vkns'k dh foi{khx.k }kjk tkucw>dj vogsyuk ;k voekuuk dh xbZ gks] ,slk rF; izdV ugha gksrk gS] vr% foi{khx.k dks uksfVl tkjh fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /09