Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46337 (RAJ)

KESHAV SINGH S/O SHRI RAMSWAROOP v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15562/2025 · 2025-11-21

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47316] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15562/2025 1. Keshav Singh S/o Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 47 Years, R/o H. No. 20, Modern City, Jamdoli, Keshav Vidhapeeth Chouraye Ke Pass, Jamdoli, District- Jaipur (Raj). 2. Ramcharan Meena S/o Badri Prasad Meena, Aged About 54 Years, R/o D-69, Dev Vihar, Behind 52 Feet Hanuman Temple, Agra Road Jamdoli, District- Jaipur (Raj). 3. Manohar Lal Meena S/o Babulal Meena, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Gup School, Ravli Block, Jawaja District- Beawar (Raj). 4. Girraj Prasad Meena S/o Ram Kishor Meena, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Gup School , Samapa ,jawaja, District- Beawar (Raj). 5. Krishan Murari S/o Girdhari Lal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Ward No- 36, Ramvas , Rajgarh, District- Churu (Raj). 6. Poonam Sain D/o Bhopala Ram Sain, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Railway Maekro Tawar Ke Pass Ward No -12, Ratangarh, District- Churu Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Deportment, Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. The Deputy Director, Ajmer Division, Secondary Education, Ajmer. 4. The Deputy Director Jaipur Division, Secondary Education, Jaipur. 5. The Deputy Director Churu Division, Secondary Education Churu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:47316] (2 of 3) [CW-15562/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to accord the due service benefits including salary of the post of Sr. Teacher/ Headmaster against which they were posted/ promoted while working as Teacher Grade II, on Patey Vetan. The respondents be directed to make payment of arrears of the salary and other due benefits for the period in which they remain posted on Patey Vetan as Techer Grade IlI, with 9% interest. This period of Patey Vetan be ordered to be counted for the purpose of seniority and other service benefits for all purposes treating them to be regularly selected candidates. ii) Any other appropriate order or direction, which the Hon'ble High Court deems fit and proper may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioner and exemplary cost, be imposed upon the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 30.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8290/2025 titled as Tara Chand and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Deen Dayal Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6653/2023 decided on 24.05.2023. He further submitted [2025:RJ-JP:47316] (3 of 3) [CW-15562/2025] that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Tara Chand and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Deen Dayal Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /92